Which method helps to ensure the Discovery process effectively maps dependencies?

Using Sniffers when direct access is not possible is an effective method to ensure that the Discovery process maps dependencies accurately. Network sniffers are tools that capture and analyze data packets traveling through the network. They can provide insights into how different systems communicate with each other, helping to identify dependencies that may not be visible through traditional means, such as direct access to servers or databases.

When direct access isn’t feasible—due to security restrictions, lack of permissions, or other limitations—sniffers can be employed to observe network traffic and understand the relationships between applications, services, and data. This capability is essential for creating a complete and accurate map of system dependencies, as it can reveal hidden interactions and dependencies that may not be documented elsewhere.

The other methods, while they may assist in the Discovery process, do not focus specifically on mapping dependencies. Centralized logging systems can help track events and errors but are not designed primarily to uncover dependency relationships. Being cautious during user data collection is important for data integrity and ethical considerations but does not directly contribute to mapping dependencies. Conducting user interviews can provide valuable insights about usage and functional relationships but can also be subjective and may not reveal all technical dependencies effectively.